skip to Main Content

Please note that this is just a preview of a school assignment posted on our website by one of our clients. If you need assistance with this question too, please click on the Learn More button at the bottom of the page to get started.

Research Paper Adam SmithInstructionsSyllabus Description:Each student will write a paper on a western political theorist of the student’s choice that is in the text book but not covered in class (upon discussion with and approval of the professor theorists not in the book may be chosen). The paper will evaluate the selected theorist’s influence on the present (last 75 years), biographical information about the theorist will be limited to less than a page. The paper will focus on the theory not the person. Outside research is required for this paper a minimum of two outside sources are required not including the text book. Dictionaries and encyclopedias are good starting places but are not considered academically acceptable sources. Students should always avoid online encyclopedias like Wikipedia. Wikipedia contains many errors and is NOT a reliable source. Generally internet sources are not acceptable for this research. The rule I use for this paper is the source must actually be in print. You do not have to have the printed copy but you must be able to cite it as if you did have the printed copy.In order to eliminate any papers on the wrong topics, a paper abstract will be due on November 3–the abstract will not be graded. Without the abstract the student runs the risk of receiving a zero on the paper for writing on the wrong topic. Besides the possibility of a wrong topic there will be a penalty on the paper if no abstract is turned in. The abstract will be a paragraph describing the topic of the paper.Each paper MUST be a minimum of 2500 words. The research paper must be typed double spaced, with one inch margins, a 12 cpi Times New Roman font, using proper in-text citations, including page numbers, a title page and references page. The paper will be due December 3. Only PDF or DOC files will be accepted. Do not forget to read the instructions and the rubric for the rubric click the three dots at the top right. PAPERS THAT DO NOT MEET THE 2500 WORDS OF TEXT REQUIREMENT WILL NOT RECEIVE A PASSING GRADE.Paper Abstract:On 11/3 students will turn a paragraph abstract, summarizing the theorist and the connection to modern society that will be discussed in the paper. The purpose of the abstract is to eliminate papers on the wrong topics, the abstract will not be graded, without the abstract the student runs the risk of receiving an F on the paper for writing on the wrong topic, points will be deducted from the paper if no abstract is turned in. Paper Format and Expectations:Section 1. In the first section of the paper students should describe the theorist’s metaphysics, a broad overview of the theory, and a brief biography–if appropriate. The metaphysics and biography should set the framework for an explanation of why the theorist came to the beliefs they hold. You should treat the the metaphysics as the premise of the paper. In addition this section should address the following questions why is the theory unique? Why is the theory important? This section should be about 2-3 pages. Section 2. Detailed discussion of the theorist’s theory, argument and conclusions. The discussion of the theory should be a detailed examination of one aspect of the theory that is applied to modern society. The discussion should include critiques of the theory. This section should be the bulk of the paper roughly 3-4 pages in length.Section 3. Apply the theory discussed to modern society. Discuss how the theory is relevant today (last 75 years). Several examples of how the theory is relevant to modern society should be explored. You can argue how the theory is misapplied today as well. Sources should be used to support why the theory is relevant. This section of the paper should be 2 pages in length.Citation and references:You can find more information here (Links to an external site.) and here (Links to an external site.)If you have any other questions do not hesitate to ask.RubricResearch Paper RubricResearch Paper RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePaper ComponentsHow well are the paper instructions followed? Was an abstract turned in?20.0 ptsAAll of the formatting instructions are followed.17.0 ptsBNot all instructions followed, or minor paper formatting issues.15.0 ptsCSeveral instructions not followed, or significant formatting issues such as font size is too big or too small.13.0 ptsDMajor formatting issues, such as not double spaced, or fully justified.10.0 ptsFPaper formatting makes the paper hard to read, lack of paragraph style writing, no references page, or not 2500 words.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary of the theorist’s metaphysicsHow well are the premises and metaphysics defined?20.0 to >18.0 ptsAA detailed discussion of the theorists metaphysics and how they apply to the aspect of the theory being explored18.0 to >16.0 ptsBA solid discussion of the theorists metaphysics, but some more connection to the theory or more detail is needed.16.0 to >14.0 ptsCSome discussion of the theorists metaphysics, but there are factual errors or the connection to the theory is not clear.14.0 to >12.0 ptsDA limited discussion of the theorists metaphysics, no connection to the theory is made and/or significant factual errors regarding the metaphysics are present.12.0 to >0 ptsFNo discussion of the metaphysics and/or no connection to the theory.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTheory/argumentAre the arguments presented in the theory illustrated logically? How well are the arguments of the theorist addressed?20.0 to >18.0 ptsAA detailed discussion of the theory and argument. The argument flows logically to and from each concept.18.0 to >16.0 ptsBA good discussion of the theory and argument. There are minor issues regarding the logical flow of the concepts, more elaboration is needed.16.0 to >14.0 ptsCThe discussion of the theory and argument needs considerable elaboration. There are factual errors, and/or significant gaps in logical flow14.0 to >12.0 ptsDLimited discussion of the theory and argument. There significant are factual errors, and/or significant aspects of the theory are not included in the argument. Aspects of the theory are misrepresented12.0 to >0 ptsFThe discussion of the theory and argument do not meet the expectations of the assignment. Significant factual errors, lack of critical thought, superficial discussion of the theory and argument.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConnection to modern societyWhat contributions to modern society did the theorist make. Are the examples detailed and nuanced?20.0 to >18.0 ptsAA through connection of the theory and argument to modern society, great examples that illustrate the the connection between theory and modern society18.0 to >16.0 ptsBA good connection of the theory and argument to modern society. Solid use of examples, though another example would be useful or more elaboration in places.16.0 to >14.0 ptsCA connection of the theory and argument to modern society. More examples or better examples are needed to illustrate the points. Considerably more elaboration is needed to make the point clear.14.0 to >12.0 ptsDLimited connection of the theory and argument to modern society. Only one example is used and does not clearly connect the theory to modern society.12.0 to >0 ptsFVirtually no connection of the theory and argument to modern society. No example is used or the examples used are inaccurate. There is no clear connection between the theory and modern society20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOverall and MechanicsIs the paper free from grammatical errors? What is the overall reaction to the paper?20.0 to >18.0 ptsAThe paper is free from grammatical errors, has outstanding content, and is organized logically18.0 to >16.0 ptsBThe paper has minor grammatical, organization or citation issues.16.0 to >14.0 ptsCThe paper has significant grammar, organization, citation issues or content accuracy issues.14.0 to >12.0 ptsDThe grammar or organizations issues are severe and take away from the substance of the paper.12.0 to >0 ptsFLacks paragraphs, lacks references page, not 2500 words, not written at a level to meet course expectations20.0 ptsTotal Points: 100.0

Get Help Today

Struggling with this particular assignment? Learn how our team of professional writers can help you today.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *