skip to Main Content

Please note that this is just a preview of a school assignment posted on our website by one of our clients. If you need assistance with this question too, please click on the Learn More button at the bottom of the page to get started.

D‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍escartes, in his quest to discover something that could serve as an indisputable starting point for constructing a system of knowledge, argued in his ontological proof of God’s existence that a perfect Being must actually exist, for otherwise it would be less than perfect. He goes on to say that “since we ‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍can in this way be certain that a perfect Being [God] exists, and such a Being must be good in order to be perfect, we can also be confident that such a Being would not deceive us.” Which of the elements of this proof, if any, strike you as debatable? Why? On what grounds would you argue for or against it‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍?

Get Help Today

Struggling with this particular assignment? Learn how our team of professional writers can help you today.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *